- Title
- Electronic health literacy among magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography medical imaging outpatients: cluster analysis
- Creator
- Hyde, Lisa Lynne; Boyes, Allison W.; Mackenzie, Lisa J.; Leigh, Lucy; Oldmeadow, Christopher; Riveros, Carlos; Sanson-Fisher, Rob
- Relation
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour Small Grant
- Relation
- Journal of Medical Internet Research Vol. 21, Issue 8, no. e13423
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13423
- Publisher
- JMIR
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2019
- Description
- Background: Variations in an individual’s electronic health (eHealth) literacy may influence the degree to which health consumers can benefit from eHealth. The eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) is a common measure of eHealth literacy. However, the lack of guidelines for the standardized interpretation of eHEALS scores limits its research and clinical utility. Cut points are often arbitrarily applied at the eHEALS item or global level, which assumes a dichotomy of high and low eHealth literacy. This approach disregards scale constructs and results in inaccurate and inconsistent conclusions. Cluster analysis is an exploratory technique, which can be used to overcome these issues, by identifying classes of patients reporting similar eHealth literacy without imposing data cut points. Objective: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to identify classes of patients reporting similar eHealth literacy and assess characteristics associated with class membership. Methods: Medical imaging outpatients were recruited consecutively in the waiting room of one major public hospital in New South Wales, Australia. Participants completed a self-report questionnaire assessing their sociodemographic characteristics and eHealth literacy, using the eHEALS. Latent class analysis was used to explore eHealth literacy clusters identified by a distance-based cluster analysis, and to identify characteristics associated with class membership. Results: Of the 268 eligible and consenting participants, 256 (95.5%) completed the eHEALS. Consistent with distance-based findings, 4 latent classes were identified, which were labeled as low (21.1%, 54/256), moderate (26.2%, 67/256), high (32.8%, 84/256), and very high (19.9%, 51/256) eHealth literacy. Compared with the low class, participants who preferred to receive a lot of health information reported significantly higher odds of moderate eHealth literacy (odds ratio 16.67, 95% CI 1.67-100.00; P=.02), and those who used the internet at least daily reported significantly higher odds of high eHealth literacy (odds ratio 4.76, 95% CI 1.59-14.29; P=.007). Conclusions: The identification of multiple classes of eHealth literacy, using both distance-based and latent class analyses, highlights the limitations of using the eHEALS global score as a dichotomous measurement tool. The findings suggest that eHealth literacy support needs vary in this population. The identification of low and moderate eHealth literacy classes indicate that the design of eHealth resources should be tailored to patients’ varying levels of eHealth literacy. eHealth literacy improvement interventions are needed, and these should be targeted based on individuals’ internet use frequency and health information amount preferences.
- Subject
- internet; health; literacy; cluster analysis; medical imaging
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1415411
- Identifier
- uon:36905
- Identifier
- ISSN:1438-8871
- Rights
- © Lisa Lynne Hyde, Allison W Boyes, Lisa J Mackenzie, Lucy Leigh, Christopher Oldmeadow, Carlos Riveros, Rob Sanson-Fisher. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 28.08.2019. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
- Language
- eng
- Full Text
- Reviewed
- Hits: 9673
- Visitors: 4874
- Downloads: 686
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | ATTACHMENT02 | Publisher version (open access) | 128 KB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |